Downloads
This paper provides novel empirical evidence on the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the division of labour among parents of school-aged children in two-parent opposite-gender families. In line with existing evidence, we find that mothers' paid work took a larger hit than that of fathers, and that mothers spent substantially longer doing childcare and housework than their partners. We go further to show that these gender differences cannot be explained by gender differences in the industries and occupations in which parents worked prior to the lockdown. Nor can they be explained by gender differences in earnings prior to the crisis: independently of which parent earned the most before the pandemic, it is always mothers who adjusted time spent on paid and unpaid work more significantly. This is the case even in households where only one partner remained active in paid work. While we cannot fully rule out that these asymmetric responses are explained by gender differences in productivity in domestic work, our results do suggest that other factors, such as gender norms, may play an important role.
Authors

Deputy Research Director
Monica is a Deputy Research Director and Professor of Economics at the University of Bristol, with an interest in Labour, Family and Public Economics.


Research Fellow
Alison is a Senior Research Economist of our Institute with research interests in the economics of gender, marriage and education.

Deputy Research Director
Sonya Krutikova is a Professor of Economics at Manchester University and IFS Deputy Research Director.

Associate Director
Christine's research examines inequalities in children's education and health, especially in the early education and childcare sector.



Working Paper details
- DOI
- 10.1920/wp.ifs.2021.1721
- Publisher
- Institute for Fiscal Studies
Suggested citation
Andrew, A et al. (2021). The gendered division of paid and domestic work under lockdown. London: Institute for Fiscal Studies. Available at: https://ifs.org.uk/publications/gendered-division-paid-and-domestic-work-under-lockdown (accessed: 25 June 2025).
More from IFS
Understand this issue

Sure Start’s wide-ranging and long-lasting benefits highlight the impact of integrated early years services
Over the long run, Sure Start’s financial benefits could be twice as high as its costs
22 May 2025

How can government reduce child poverty?
We're exploring why there's been an increase in child poverty since 2010 and options the government has to reduce this.
3 October 2024

Childcare and the early years: what are the new entitlements and how will they be delivered?
1 July 2024
Policy analysis

Popularity of new childcare entitlements could leave spending much higher than initially forecast
New childcare entitlements have proven popular – meaning spending from 2026 onwards could be £1 billion higher than originally forecast.
12 June 2025

The short- and medium-term effects of Sure Start on children’s outcomes
An evaluation of Sure Start’s impacts on education, health, absences, special educational needs, crime and social care, plus a cost–benefit analysis.
22 May 2025

What the Spending Review really means for schools
The next few years are going to be very tight for school budgets and forecasting anything more than a real-terms freeze is highly optimistic.
12 June 2025
Academic research

A symposium on poverty, the safety net and child development: preface
These papers revise current understanding of the consequences of child poverty and of the role of safety nets for protecting disadvantaged children.
23 June 2025

Theoretical and empirical perspectives on the link between poverty, parenting and children's outcomes
We examine different channels through which poverty affects child outcomes, as well as the evidence regarding the magnitude of their impacts.
23 June 2025

Has COVID-19 vaccination success increased the marginal willingness to pay taxes?
We test whether the vaccination process increased the marginal willingness to pay taxes (MWTP).
23 June 2025