Downloads

Download working paper here
PDF | 708.37 KB
We ask whether it is more effective to target men, women, or both – with the same intervention in the same context – to improve women’s outcomes when behaviour is governed by gendered social norms. We conduct a cluster-randomized controlled trial of an edutainment intervention in Pakistan – aimed at delaying marriage of adolescent girls, whereas community norms favour early marriage. We find that targeting men, either alone or jointly with women, reduces child marriages in households directly targeted by the intervention. Targeting women, however, either alone or jointly with men, leads to sustained reductions in child marriages at the village level. To rationalize this pattern of results, we build on a model of Bayesian persuasion in the household, where women are more hesitant to deviate from social norms. We extend this by allowing for gender-segregated information transmission from targeted spouses to other households in the village.
Authors

Research Associate World Bank
Rachel Cassidy is a Research Associate of the IFS and a Research Economist at the World Bank's Africa Gender Innovation Lab.

PhD Candidate Utrecht University of Economics

Amsterdam Institute for International Development

Centre for Economic Research Pakistan

Associate Professor of Economics Utrecht University of Economics
Working Paper details
- DOI
- 10.1920/wp.ifs.2024.2324
- Publisher
- Institute for Fiscal Studies
Suggested citation
Cassidy, R et al. (2024). Targeting men, women or both to reduce child marriage. 24/23. London: Institute for Fiscal Studies. Available at: https://ifs.org.uk/publications/targeting-men-women-or-both-reduce-child-marriage (accessed: 19 June 2025).
More from IFS
Understand this issue

Sure Start’s wide-ranging and long-lasting benefits highlight the impact of integrated early years services
Over the long run, Sure Start’s financial benefits could be twice as high as its costs
22 May 2025

Spending Review 2025: What it means and why it matters
We take a closer look at the Spending Review and what the policies mean for public services, investment and the wider economy.
12 June 2025

Rethinking the Education Maintenance Allowance: Lessons from a long-term analysis
This evidence should prompt us to look beyond simple financial incentives for classroom attendance.
10 March 2025
Policy analysis

Popularity of new childcare entitlements could leave spending much higher than initially forecast
New childcare entitlements have proven popular – meaning spending from 2026 onwards could be £1 billion higher than originally forecast.
12 June 2025

What does the Spending Review really mean for FE?
The chancellor has pledged an extra £1.2 billion annually for FE by 2028-29. But will this be enough to reverse a decade of cuts?
12 June 2025

Council tax hikes will do the heavy lifting
IFS Senior Research Economist Kate Ogden writes in Municipal Journal about what the 2025 Spending Review will mean for public services and councils.
17 June 2025
Academic research

Revealed beliefs and the marriage market return to education
We develop a new methodology to estimate subjective beliefs from hypothetical choice data.
15 April 2025

Call for papers: IFS-ADBI-GHE Workshop on Health Economics in LMICs 2025
Submissions are open until 15th February for the IFS-GHE Workshop on Health Economics in LMIC 2025

Female genital cutting and the slave trade
We investigate the historical origins of female genital cutting (FGC) and how FGC is associated with the Red Sea route of the African slave trade.
10 May 2025