Downloads

WP202010-Changes-in-Assortative-Matching-1.pdf
PDF | 815.33 KB
The extent to which like-with like marry is particularly important for inequality as well as for the outcomes of children that result from the union. In this paper we discuss approaches to the measurement of changes in assortative mating. We derive two key conditions that a well-defined measure should satisfy. We argue that changes in assortativeness should be interpreted through a structural model of the marriage market; in particular, a crucial issue is how they relate to variations in the economic surplus generated by marriage. We propose a very general criterion of increase in assortativeness, and show that almost all indices used in the literature are implied by our criterion – with one notable exception, that moreover violates one of our conditions. Finally, we use our approach to evaluate the evolution of assortative matching in the US over the last decades, and conclude that assortative matching has increased, particularly at the top of the education distribution.
Authors

Research Fellow Yale University
Costas is a Research Fellow of the IFS and a Professor of Economics at Yale University and a Visiting Professor at University College London.

Deputy Research Director
Monica is a Deputy Research Director and Professor of Economics at the University of Bristol, with an interest in Labour, Family and Public Economics.

Columbia University
Working Paper details
- DOI
- 10.1920/wp.ifs.2020.1020
- Publisher
- The IFS
Suggested citation
P, Chiappori and M, Costa Dias and C, Meghir. (2020). Changes in assortative matching: theory and evidence for the US. London: The IFS. Available at: https://ifs.org.uk/publications/changes-assortative-matching-theory-and-evidence-us (accessed: 18 June 2025).
More from IFS
Understand this issue

Average household consumption spending before and after housing costs, and mean weekly per-capita income, in different local authorities, 2018–2019
Londoners may have the highest average incomes, but their household spending once you account for housing costs is lower than other regions.
11 April 2025

Rank of local authorities by average household income compared to rank by average consumption after housing costs
On average, London local authorities rank at the top of the income distribution, but are bottom of the net-of-housing consumption distribution.
11 April 2025

Professor Sir Richard Blundell to give the Marshall Paley Lecture on inequalities
27 September 2024
Policy analysis

IFS Deaton Review: Inequalities in the 21st Century special session at the RES 2025 Annual Conference
This year's RES Conference features a special session on the IFS Deaton Review of Inequalities with key IFS contributors to the review.
16 June 2025

Which places have the highest standard of living?
Measuring living standards using average household spending gives a starkly different picture of regional inequalities than using average income.
11 April 2025

How should governments help households during an energy crisis?
The government spent billions on support to help households with their energy bills in 2022–23. Could a better-designed package have saved money?
31 January 2025
Academic research

Measuring cost of living inequality during an inflation surge
We provide new evidence that inflation inequality surged during the 2021–2023 cost-of living crisis.
9 May 2025

Estimating intra-household sharing from time-use data
Estimating intra-household sharing is crucial to understanding overall inequality. However, expenditure data is almost always at the household level.
2 May 2025

Revealed beliefs and the marriage market return to education
We develop a new methodology to estimate subjective beliefs from hypothetical choice data.
15 April 2025