Downloads
We present a methodology for the structural empirical analysis of household consumption and time use behaviour under marital stability. Our approach is of the revealed preference type and non-parametric, meaning that it does not require a prior functional specification of individual utilities. Without making use of the transferable utility assumption, but still allowing for monetary transfers, our method can identify individuals’ unobserved match qualities and quantify them in money metric terms. We can include both preference factors, affecting individuals’ preferences over private and public goods, and match quality factors, driving differences in unobserved match quality. We demonstrate the practical usefulness of our methodology through an application to the Belgian MEqIn data. Our results reveal intuitive patterns of unobserved match quality that allow us to rationalise both the observed matches and the within-household allocations of time and money.
Authors

Research Associate University of Copenhagen
Martin is an IFS Research Associate, a Nuffield Senior Research Fellow and a Professor of Economics at the University of Oxford.

Research Associate Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
Laurens is a Research Associate of the IFS and a Professor in the Department of Economics, KU Leuven.

Research Associate Université libre de Bruxelles
Bram is a Research Associate of the IFS, a Professor of Economics at ULB and a Professor of Mathematics and Statistics at KU Leuven.

Research Associate University of Leuven
Frederic is a Research Associate of the IFS, a Professor of Economics at the University of Leuven and a Research Fellow at the CEPR.

Working Paper details
- DOI
- 10.1920/wp.ifs.2021.3121
- Publisher
- Institute for Fiscal Studies
Suggested citation
Browning, M et al. (2021). Stable marriage, household consumption and unobserved match quality. London: Institute for Fiscal Studies. Available at: https://ifs.org.uk/publications/stable-marriage-household-consumption-and-unobserved-match-quality (accessed: 18 June 2025).
More from IFS
Understand this issue

Sure Start’s wide-ranging and long-lasting benefits highlight the impact of integrated early years services
Over the long run, Sure Start’s financial benefits could be twice as high as its costs
22 May 2025

How did parents’ experiences in the labour market shape children’s social and emotional development during the pandemic?
1 August 2023

Gender norms, violence and adolescent girls’ trajectories: Evidence from India
24 October 2022
Policy analysis

Which places have the highest standard of living?
Measuring living standards using average household spending gives a starkly different picture of regional inequalities than using average income.
11 April 2025

Popularity of new childcare entitlements could leave spending much higher than initially forecast
New childcare entitlements have proven popular – meaning spending from 2026 onwards could be £1 billion higher than originally forecast.
12 June 2025

The short- and medium-term effects of Sure Start on children’s outcomes
An evaluation of Sure Start’s impacts on education, health, absences, special educational needs, crime and social care, plus a cost–benefit analysis.
22 May 2025
Academic research

Estimating intra-household sharing from time-use data
Estimating intra-household sharing is crucial to understanding overall inequality. However, expenditure data is almost always at the household level.
2 May 2025

Using tax records to correct for under-representation of top income sources in surveys
We show that the survey correction method of Blanchet, Flores and Morgan (2022) can fail to correct its structure by components.
6 May 2025

Female empowerment and household emissions
We find that women have lower emissions propensities than men, and therefore greater female empowerment is associated with lower household emissions.
2 May 2025