Access
We study how emergency department (ED) doctors respond to incentives to reduce wait times. We use bunching techniques to study an English policy that imposed strong incentives to treat patients within four hours. The policy reduced time spent in the ED by 21 minutes for affected patients yet caused doctors to increase treatment intensity and admit more patients. We find a striking 14% reduction in mortality. Analysis of patient severity and hospital crowding strongly suggests it is the wait time reduction that saves lives. We conclude that, despite distorting medical decisions, constraining ED doctors can induce cost-effective reductions in mortality.
Authors


Research Associate Amazon
Thomas is a Research Associate of the IFS and the Head of Economic Decision Science at Amazon.

Research Associate Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Jonathan is a Research Associate at the IFS and the Ford Professor of Economics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Journal article details
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_01044
- Publisher
- The President and Fellows of Harvard College and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology
- ISSN
- 1530-9142
- Issue
- Volume 105, Issue 1, January 2023, pages 1-19
Suggested citation
Gruber, J., Hoe, T., and Stoye, G. (2023), 'Saving lives by tying hands: The unexpected effects of constraining health care providers', The Review of Economics and Statistics, 105(1), 1–19, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_01044
More from IFS
Understand this issue

Simulated list size and performance against the 18-week target under a variety of treatment growth rate assumptions
Although performance improves in each case, in none of our scenarios does performance reach the 92% target by the end of the parliament.
20 March 2025

Sure Start’s wide-ranging and long-lasting benefits highlight the impact of integrated early years services
Over the long run, Sure Start’s financial benefits could be twice as high as its costs
22 May 2025

Social care is the nightmare that won’t go away
A government with a big majority should have had the political will to do more than just set up another review.
6 January 2025
Policy analysis

NHS funding in the 2025 Spending Review explained
Will the government announce more spending on the NHS in the Spending Review? Senior IFS Research Economist Max Warner explains here in 60 seconds.
10 June 2025

The short- and medium-term effects of Sure Start on children’s outcomes
An evaluation of Sure Start’s impacts on education, health, absences, special educational needs, crime and social care, plus a cost–benefit analysis.
22 May 2025

Council tax hikes will do the heavy lifting
IFS Senior Research Economist Kate Ogden writes in Municipal Journal about what the 2025 Spending Review will mean for public services and councils.
17 June 2025
Academic research

Future challenges for health and social care provision in the UK
We consider recent trends in health and social care productivity and the scope for future improvements.
6 June 2025

Is there a public sector earnings premium in UK healthcare?
Using the Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings, we provide the first estimates of intra-occupation sectoral hourly remuneration differentials.
6 May 2025

The menopause "penalty"
We show that a menopause diagnosis leads to lasting drops in earnings and employment, alongside greater reliance on social transfers.
21 March 2025