Downloads
ewp0701.pdf
PDF | 254.32 KB
When analysing choices or policy impacts, economists generally rely on what people actually do, rather than what they say they would do. The "stated response" approach is treated with scepticism due, for example, to concerns regarding the effect of strategic or social considerations on what people say, and a belief that people may not adequately consider such a hypothetical question. This paper evaluates an example of this approach; the direct questioning of parents as to whether they would withdraw their children from school if the Familias en Accion education subsidies were withdrawn. Our results suggest that these concerns are not entirely invalid but that the stated responses do provide important information and correlate in the expected manner with child and household characteristics. We conclude by emphasising the importance of good question design, which may allow researchers to use the "stated response" method as a complement to more typical quantitative methodologies.
Authors
Research Fellow University College London
Emla Fitzsimons is a Professor of Economics at the University College London Institute of Education and a Research Fellow at the IFS.
Research Fellow University College London
Marcos is a Research Fellow at IFS, an Affiliate at the Rural Education Action Program and a Professor of Economics at the University College London.
Associate Director
David is Head of Devolved and Local Government Finance. He also works on tax in developing countries as part of our TaxDev centre.
Working Paper details
- Publisher
- Institute for Fiscal Studies
Suggested citation
E, Fitzsimons and D, Phillips and M, Vera-Hernandez. (2007). What would you do? An investigation of stated-response data. London: Institute for Fiscal Studies. Available at: https://ifs.org.uk/publications/what-would-you-do-investigation-stated-response-data (accessed: 4 May 2024).
More from IFS
Understand this issue
Sure Start achieved its aims, then we threw it away
15 April 2024
Retirement is not always a choice that workers can afford to make
6 November 2023
If you can’t see it, you can’t be it: role models influence female junior doctors’ choice of medical specialty
24 April 2024
Policy analysis
Progression of nurses within the NHS
12 April 2024
Regional variation in earnings and the retention of NHS staff in Agenda for Change bands 1 to 4
10 April 2024
Recent trends in public sector pay
26 March 2024
Academic research
Police infrastructure, police performance, and crime: Evidence from austerity cuts
24 April 2024
Labour market inequality and the changing life cycle profile of male and female wages
15 April 2024
Interpreting cohort profiles of lifecycle earnings volatility
15 April 2024