Property taxes in developing countries are plagued by noncompliance and can exacerbate liquidity constraints. We characterize optimal enforcement and taxation policies as functions of revenue elasticities and measures of taxpayer hardship. We estimate these parameters using multiple sources of variation and administrative data from Mexico City. Both rate increases and enhanced enforcement raise revenue, but liquidity constraints also shape taxpayer behavior. Despite the presence of liquidity constraints, we find that raising tax rates increases welfare. In contrast, enforcement generates higher private costs than welfare benefits. On the margin, welfare-maximizing governments would prefer to increase tax rates rather than enhance enforcement.
This paper was produced as a part of CEPR's Discussion Paper Series (DP15983).
Authors

Research Fellow University College London
Anne is the research fellow at IFS and an honorary faculty member at UCL. Her work focuses on tax policy in lower-income countries.

Research Fellow University of Notre Dame
Alejandro is an IFS Research Fellow and an Assistant Professor of Development Economics at the University of Notre Dame.

Karina Ramírez Arras
Report details
- DOI
- 10.1920/re.ifs.2024.0595
- Publisher
- IFS
Suggested citation
A, Brockmeyer and A, Estefan and K, Ramírez Arras. (2021). Taxing property in developing countries: theory and evidence from Mexico. London: IFS. Available at: https://ifs.org.uk/publications/taxing-property-developing-countries-theory-and-evidence-mexico (accessed: 23 May 2025).
Related documents
More from IFS
Understand this issue

Drastic times need drastic action: breaking the 50-year tax taboo
Rachel Reeves should consider increasing the basic rate, just as Denis Healey did in 1975
14 April 2025

Spring Statement 2025: IFS Zooms In
What were the decisions and trade-offs made by Chancellor Reeves?
27 March 2025

Why is the government reforming health-related benefits?
We discuss the government's welfare reforms aimed at helping sick and disabled people into work, and what the changes mean for health-related benefits
14 May 2025
Policy analysis

IFS ‘Be the Chancellor’ tool illustrates all-important choices at upcoming Spending Review
The 'Be the Chancellor' tool, built by IFS researchers in partnership with Nesta, illustrates key choices and fiscal challenges Rachel Reeves faces.
21 May 2025

Radical tax and spending plans are fine, but they must be realistic
The rise of Reform and the Greens is healthy for democracy, but not if their manifestos are sheer fantasy
12 May 2025

Expanding winter fuel payment eligibility
In this comment we consider what options the government has to expand WFP eligibility
21 May 2025
Academic research

Call for papers: IFS-ADBI-GHE Workshop on Health Economics in LMICs 2025
Submissions are open until 15th February for the IFS-GHE Workshop on Health Economics in LMIC 2025

Landfill tax and recycling
This paper provides new empirical evidence on the role of landfill taxes in reducing landfill waste and promoting recycling.
6 May 2025

Focal pricing constraints and pass-through of input cost changes
I show that the adoption and extent of focal pricing practices in an industry in general do not lower average pass-through of input cost changes.
2 May 2025