Advertising of high fat, salt or sugar (HFSS) food and drink during children’s television programmes has been banned in the UK since 2007. The Government has recently announced that they will consult on further advertising restrictions for products high in fat, salt and sugar on TV.
The effects of further restrictions on health outcomes will depend on a number of factors: how exposure to advertising is affected, how firms respond in terms of prices, reformulation and other behaviours, how these changes affect the purchase and consumption decisions that households and individuals make, how all of this varies across individuals and how reductions in consumption affects health outcomes.
In this report we discuss the potential effects of banning all advertising of HFSS food and drink before the watershed and how this will depend on each of the channels mentioned above, highlighting where there is uncertainty about the magnitude of the effects.
Authors

CPP Co-Director
Rachel is Research Director and Professor at the University of Manchester. She was made a Dame for services to economic policy and education in 2021.

Research Fellow University of Wisconsin
Martin, previously Deputy Research Director, is a Research Fellow at IFS and Professor of Economics at the University of Wisconsin.

Research Fellow London School of Economics
Kate is an IFS Research Fellow and an Assistant Professor at LSE, interested in public finance, industrial organisation and applied microeconomics.

Rebekah Stroud
Report details
- Publisher
- The Obesity Policy Research Unit
Suggested citation
Griffith, R et al. (2019). The potential impacts of banning television advertising of HFSS food and drink before the watershed. London: The Obesity Policy Research Unit. Available at: https://ifs.org.uk/publications/potential-impacts-banning-television-advertising-hfss-food-and-drink-watershed (accessed: 21 May 2025).
Related documents
More from IFS
Understand this issue

Simulated list size and performance against the 18-week target under a variety of treatment growth rate assumptions
Although performance improves in each case, in none of our scenarios does performance reach the 92% target by the end of the parliament.
20 March 2025

Air pollution in England by MSOA over time, measured by PM2.5 exposure, 2003 to 2023
Average exposure to PM2.5 in England fell by 54% between 2003 and 2023. Almost everywhere in England is now below England’s 2040 target for PM2.5.
6 December 2024

Why is the government reforming health-related benefits?
We discuss the government's welfare reforms aimed at helping sick and disabled people into work, and what the changes mean for health-related benefits
14 May 2025
Policy analysis

Working in your 60s: a way to stay young for some
On average, women who remained in work for longer following increases in the state pension age saw improved cognition and less physical disability.
13 May 2025

The relationship between NHS waiting lists and health-related benefit claims
Have increases in NHS waiting lists and waiting times contributed to the growing number of people claiming working-age health-related benefits?
2 May 2025

Percentage of patients waiting less than 18 weeks for elective treatment in England
Performance against the NHS' 18-week waiting times target has since deteriorated gradually before a sharp fall during the pandemic.
20 March 2025
Academic research

Call for papers: IFS-ADBI-GHE Workshop on Health Economics in LMICs 2025
Submissions are open until 15th February for the IFS-GHE Workshop on Health Economics in LMIC 2025

The impact of work on cognition and physical disability: Evidence from English women
We show that remaining in work has significant positive causal effects on the average cognition and physical mobility of older women in England.
13 May 2025

The health effects of universal early childhood interventions: evidence from Sure Start
We estimate the health impacts of Sure Start, a universal integrated ECI in England, from infancy to adolescence.
9 May 2025