In the deepest and most far reaching analysis of the UK tax system in more than 30 years, the Mirrlees Review puts the case for radical tax reform. It shows how the current system is inefficient, overly complex and frequently unfair. And it sets out a range of proposals designed to increase output and welfare.
Government, through the tax system, takes around £4 in every £10 earned in the economy. It is not surprising that getting tax design wrong can be hugely costly. Yet the level and quality of debate on tax policy is inadequate; there has rarely been any clear sense of direction from governments; and expensive and damaging mistakes have been all too common.
In the UK poor tax design contributes to an inefficient housing market, distortionary taxation of financial services, excessive reliance on debt finance, employment levels lower than they need be and distorted and inefficient savings and investment decisions. The review sets out a long term strategy for reform, and in doing so speaks to immediate policy priorities.
Authors
Senior Economist
Stuart is a Senior Economist working in the Tax sector, and focuses on analysing the design of the tax and benefit system.
Research Associate London School of Economics
Timothy is a Research Associate at the IFS and a Professor of Economics and Political Science at the London School of Economics and Political Science.
CPP Co-Director
Richard is Co-Director of the Centre for the Microeconomic Analysis of Public Policy (CPP) and Senior Research Fellow at IFS.
Stephen Bond
Robert Chote
Research Fellow One Essex Court
Malcolm is Chairman of the Tax Law Review Committee at IFS.
Gareth Myles
Director
Paul has been the Director of the IFS since 2011. He is also currently visiting professor in the Department of Economics at University College London.
Research Associate Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)
James is an IFS Research Associate, the Mitsui Professor of Economics at MIT and the President of the National Bureau of Economic Research.
Research Fellow University of Cambridge and The Chinese University of Hong Kong
Press Release details
- Publisher
- IFS
More from IFS
Understand this issue
How can Rachel Reeves make her first Budget a success?
We’re look at some of the challenges facing the Chancellor and what she can learn from previous Budgets.
24 October 2024
What does the Budget mean for the UK?
We discuss the Chancellor's first Budget and what impact the changes could have.
31 October 2024
We can’t have any more budgets where speculation is running wild
Rachel Reeves needs to deliver a clear statement of intent for the remainder of this government’s time in office
28 October 2024
Policy analysis
Autumn Budget 2024: IFS analysis
At this online webinar IFS researchers presented their initial response to new Chancellor Rachel Reeves' first Budget.
Share of deaths subject to inheritance tax
By 2029–30, the share of deaths liable for inheritance tax is forecast to rise to reach its highest level in over 50 years.
31 October 2024
Impact of reforms on annual disposable household income, 2024–25 to 2029–30
On top of inherited plans, personal tax and benefit measures will on average reduce incomes by £1,400 over this parliament.
31 October 2024
Academic research
Tax preferences and housing affordability: Exploration using a life-cycle model
We present a dynamic life-cycle model of demand for housing, including owner occupied housing, investment property and liquid assets.
21 October 2024
Wage effects of means-tested transfers: Incidence implications of using firms as intermediaries
We show that how countries disburse tax credits matters for economic incidence by exploiting reform to the disbursement of child benefits in Argentina
22 October 2024
The effect of tax incentives on retirement saving
This paper estimates the responsiveness of retirement saving to tax incentives for employees in Great Britain.
15 October 2024