Downloads
![Image representing the file: wp1007.pdf](/sites/default/files/output_url_files/wp1007.pdf_0.jpg)
wp1007.pdf
PDF | 725.18 KB
<p>This paper uses a survey-based approach to test alternative methods of channeling tax relief to donors - as a tax rebate for the donor or as a matched payment to the receiving charity. On accounting grounds these two are equivalent but, in line with earlier experimental studies, we find that gross donations are significantly more responsive to a match change than to a rebate change. We show that the difference can largely be explained by the fact that a majority of donors do not adjust their nominal donations in response to a change in subsidy. This evidence adds to the growing empirical literature suggesting that consumers may not react to tax changes. In the case of tax subsidies for donations, this has implications for policy design - we show for the UK that a match-based system is likely to be more effective at increasing money going to charities. </p>
Authors
![Person graphic](/sites/default/files/styles/square_desktop/public/2022-06/IFS-person-graphic.png?itok=hWCtTSrz)
Research Associate University of Nottingham
Kim is Professor of Economics and Public Policy and Head of the School of Economics at the University of Nottingham.
![Sarah Smith](/sites/default/files/styles/square_desktop/public/2022-07/Sarah%20Smith.jpg?itok=0-hn5Gx1)
Research Associate University of Bristol
Sarah is a Research Associate at the IFS and Head of the Department of Economics at the University of Bristol with interest in applied microeconomics.
Working Paper details
- DOI
- 10.1920/wp.ifs.2010.1007
- Publisher
- IFS
Suggested citation
Scharf, K and Smith, S. (2010). The price elasticity of charitable giving: does the form of tax relief matter?. London: IFS. Available at: https://ifs.org.uk/publications/price-elasticity-charitable-giving-does-form-tax-relief-matter (accessed: 30 June 2024).
More from IFS
Understand this issue
![Microphone](/sites/default/files/styles/square_desktop/public/2024-06/Microphone.jpg?itok=soM7Wvbz)
Election Special: Your questions answered
27 June 2024
![Tom Waters](/sites/default/files/styles/square_desktop/public/2024-06/tom%20waters.jpg?itok=faDtwS3F)
What is the two-child limit in benefits?
27 June 2024
![Interview](/sites/default/files/styles/square_desktop/public/2024-06/1.jpg?itok=mjderngL)
Election Special: The big issues politicians haven't spoken about
25 June 2024
Policy analysis
![Welsh town with mountains behind](/sites/default/files/styles/square_desktop/public/2024-06/Welsh-town-feature.jpg?itok=5axb5wZn)
How would the parties’ tax and spending plans affect Scotland and Wales?
28 June 2024
![Polling station](/sites/default/files/styles/square_desktop/public/2024-06/Polling-station-school.jpg?itok=uS-l6b-1)
What are the parties’ plans for benefits and taxes?
24 June 2024
![Mother with sons](/sites/default/files/styles/square_desktop/public/2024-06/Mother-with-sons.jpg?itok=YhJmjOrZ)
The two-child limit: poverty, incentives and cost
17 June 2024
Academic research
![Journal cover](/sites/default/files/styles/portrait/public/2024-01/Review%20of%20Economics%20and%20Statistics.jpg?itok=17sKhTtl)
Intertemporal income shifting and the taxation of business owner-managers
24 January 2024
![Journal Article Cover](/sites/default/files/styles/portrait/public/2024-02/Fiscal%20Studies%20-%202024%20-%20%20-%20Issue%20Information_Page_1.jpg?itok=GfdQz4AB)
Saving by buying ahead: stockpiling in response to lump-sum payments
2 February 2024
![Working paper cover](/sites/default/files/styles/portrait/public/2024-03/WP202405-The-menopause-penalty.jpg?itok=EMllthlH)
The menopause "penalty"
18 March 2024