Downloads
wp9918.pdf
PDF | 203.46 KB
The paper examines social security (public pension) reforms in which the programme is partially shifted from a public unfunded basis to a private, prefunded, basis. It focuses on reforms where individuals have a choice in switching from public funded to private unfunded programmes (as in the ѣontracting outҍ scheme in the UK), or where some individuals are forced to join the funded scheme, or reforms which combine both these options. The welfare consequences of such reform strategies are analysed both from an individual and a macroeconomic perspective. The paper also examines whether individuals respond Ѳationally' to the incentives inherent in such programmes.
Authors
Research Associate University of Sussex
Richard is an IFS Research Associate, a Part-time Professor of Economics at the University of Sussex and a Visiting Professor of Economics at UCL.
Robert Palacios
Edward Whitehouse
Working Paper details
- DOI
- 10.1920/wp.ifs.1999.9918
- Publisher
- IFS
Suggested citation
R, Disney and R, Palacios and E, Whitehouse. (1999). Individual choice of pension arrangement as a pension reform strategy. London: IFS. Available at: https://ifs.org.uk/publications/individual-choice-pension-arrangement-pension-reform-strategy (accessed: 19 May 2024).
More from IFS
Understand this issue
Where next for the state pension?
13 December 2023
Social mobility and wealth
12 December 2023
Autumn Statement 2023: IFS analysis
23 November 2023
Policy analysis
The past and future of UK health spending
14 May 2024
Recent trends in and the outlook for health-related benefits
19 April 2024
Progression of nurses within the NHS
12 April 2024
Academic research
Keeping the peace whilst getting your way: Information, persuasion and intimate partner violence
17 May 2024
The role of hospital networks in individual mortality
13 May 2024
Forced displacement, mental health, and child development: Evidence from Rohingya refugees
10 May 2024