Follow us
Publications Commentary Research People Events News Resources and Videos About IFS
Home Publications What might rising interest rates mean for different generations?

What might rising interest rates mean for different generations?

Observation

Earlier this week, markets reacted to comments by the governor of the Bank of England by bringing forward their expectations of when interest rates will rise. Bank Rate currently sits at an ultra-low 0.1% and hasn’t exceeded 1% since January 2009 but markets are now pricing-in an increase at next month’s MPC meeting and expect rates to reach 1% by next summer.

It remains uncertain when any rate rises will arrive, and they are likely to be gradual when they do. However, questions are being asked about what effects rising rates would have on the economic prospects of different generations. This observation highlights that the rising outlook for interest rates over the last 18 months is modest in the context of the falls seen over the last 15 years and expectations are that interest rates will remain low for years ahead. The key effects of rising rates are likely to be increased mortgage payments for those of working-age in the short-term, and any effects on asset prices relative to incomes are likely to be modest compared to the large increases seen over recent decades.

Impact on interest income and debt repayments

The most obvious and immediate impacts of an increase in interest rates come through its effects on income from interest-bearing accounts and on debt repayments – such as mortgages and credit cards – with variable interest rates. A change in interest rates won’t necessarily be passed on immediately or fully into a change in the interest paid on savings accounts and on the rates of interest charged on loans. For example, a growing share of new mortgages taken out in recent years have rates that are fixed for five years or longer. Nevertheless, we get an impression of which age-groups stand to gain or lose from the impacts of a rate rise on interest income and debt payments by looking at the size of their debts (including mortgages, unsecured loans and credit card balances) compared to their interest-bearing assets (including current accounts, savings accounts, cash ISAs and National Savings and Investments products).

Figure 1.1 shows the percentage of individuals who live in a household with debts (not including student loans where the interest rate is fixed or linked to the RPI) larger than their interest-bearing assets, split by age-group. This share increases from around half of those in their 20s to peak at 70% of those in their late 30s and early 40s, before declining with age. This pattern is driven by people taking out debt – including mortgages when they buy a home – as they move through their 20s and 30s and then paying this down as they age, while accumulation of interest-bearing assets grows with age, particularly for those older than 50.

Figure 1.1 also shows the 25th percentile, 50th percentile and 75th percentile of the distribution of household net interest-bearing assets (i.e. interest-bearing assets minus debts) as a share of annual income. The age-pattern in debt and asset holding means while the median individual in their late 30s or early 40s is in a household with net interest-bearing debt worth more than annual income, the median person in their late 60s and 70s has household net interest bearing assets worth 70% or more of annual income. Differences within age-groups are substantial: while 30% of those in their early 40s have net interest bearing assets, one quarter have net debts – mostly mortgages – worth more than three times annual income.

This means that on average, those in their 30s and 40s stand to lose the most, and those around retirement to gain the most, from the short-term impact of a rise in interest rates on interest income and debt repayments. However, the differences within generations are also large.

Figure 1.1. Distribution of household net interest-bearing assets as a multiple of annual income (LHS) and percentage of individuals in households with negative net interest-bearing assets (RHS), by age-group

Figure 1.1. Distribution of household net interest-bearing assets as a multiple of annual income (LHS) and percentage of individuals in households with negative net interest-bearing assets (RHS), by age-group

Source: Author’s calculations using Wealth and Assets Survey Round 6 (2016-2018)

Note: Interest-bearing assets is the sum of current accounts, savings accounts, cash ISAs, National Savings and Investments products, net of mortgages, formal unsecured loans (not including student loans) and outstanding credit card balances.

Impact on asset prices

What about the wider impacts of an increase in interest rates on asset prices? Research by the Bank of England found that falling rates following the financial crisis increased asset prices and that this had the most positive effect on wealth for those around retirement age, who hold the largest amounts of financial assets, housing wealth and un-annuitised pension wealth. A rise in asset prices, if maintained, implies a gain for those who hold those assets and sell them in the future and a loss for those who would buy them.

Does this mean that a rise in rates will decrease the value of financial assets and housing wealth, hitting the wealth of those around retirement age the most? Would a fall in asset prices be something to welcome for those at younger ages who aspire to get onto or move up the housing ladder?

The prices of assets like houses and stocks and shares depend not just on interest rates today but the outlook for rates over the medium term. Figure 1.2 shows that there has been a significant increase in the future interest rates implied by government bond yields since April 2020, when the pandemic began, especially at shorter time horizons. However, these increases are actually modest compared to the enormous decline in rates that has taken place since 2006.

Figure 1.2. Instantaneous forward curve for government gilts

Figure 1.2. Instantaneous forward curve for government giltsSource: Bank of England

Further, yields on index-linked gilts, which account for expected inflation, have seen less of an increase over recent months. In fact, looking more than 13 years ahead, the interest rates implied by the real yield on index-linked gilts are now lower than in April 2020. This implies that higher nominal bond yields are largely a response to higher expectations of inflation, meaning a smaller increase, or even fall, in expected real (after inflation) rates of interest in the medium term. That higher inflation will help to erode the real value of mortgage debt for those younger people who already own a home. But the modest changes in real interest rates mean no big change in circumstances for those looking to buy.

The bigger picture is that while Bank Rate is now expected to rise, the medium-term outlook for real interest rates has seen only very small changes relative to the large falls in interest rates of recent decades. That means that we are far from seeing the unwinding of the large increases in asset prices compared to incomes that took place in recent decades and that are likely a key driver of the collapse in homeownership rates of those in their 20s and 30s. For younger generations, that means accumulating wealth going forwards is likely to be more difficult than for preceding generations, and potentially more reliant on receiving transfers from wealthy parents.

Deaton inequality website

More on this topic

Report
We look at the differences between men and women in all activities that can be labelled as ‘work’.
Press release
It is only because of the increase in women’s educational attainment that there has been any meaningful progress in closing the gender earnings gap.
Newspaper article
'If women hadn’t become better-educated than men, we might well be looking at pay and employment gaps barely changed in the past quarter of a century.'