Downloads

CW7019-A-tale-of-two-Koreas-property-rights-and-fairness.pdf
PDF | 908.12 KB
We compare two groups of the non-student Korean population—native-born South Koreans (SK) and North Korean refugees (NK)—with contrasting institutional and cultural backgrounds. In our experiment, the subjects play dictator games under three different treatments in which the income source varies: first, the income is randomly given to the subject; second, it is earned by the subject; third, it is individually earned by the subject and an anonymous partner and then pooled together. We find that preferences for giving depend on the income source in different ways for the SK and NK subjects. The SK subjects become more selfish when the income is individually earned than when it is gifted to them. Furthermore, the NK subjects are not responsive to the earned income treatment but behave more pro-socially when individually earned incomes are pooled. The NK subjects behave in a more self-interested manner when they participated in market activities in North Korea.
Authors

Research Fellow Columbia University
Sokbae is an IFS Research Fellow and a Professor at Columbia University, with an interest in Econometrics, Applied Microeconomics and Statistics.

University of Arkansas

Syngjoo Choi

Byung-Yeon Kim
Working Paper details
- DOI
- 10.1920/wp.cem.2019.7019
- Publisher
- The IFS
Suggested citation
Choi, S et al. (2019). A tale of two Koreas: property rights and fairness. London: The IFS. Available at: https://ifs.org.uk/publications/tale-two-koreas-property-rights-and-fairness (accessed: 19 April 2025).
More from IFS
Understand this issue

Gender norms, violence and adolescent girls’ trajectories: Evidence from India
24 October 2022

Drastic times need drastic action: breaking the 50-year tax taboo
Rachel Reeves should consider increasing the basic rate, just as Denis Healey did in 1975
14 April 2025

Average household consumption spending before and after housing costs, and mean weekly per-capita income, in different local authorities, 2018–2019
Londoners may have the highest average incomes, but their household spending once you account for housing costs is lower than other regions.
11 April 2025
Policy analysis

Which places have the highest standard of living?
Measuring living standards using average household spending gives a starkly different picture of regional inequalities than using average income.
11 April 2025

IFS Deputy Director Carl Emmerson appointed to the UK Statistics Authority Methodological Assurance Review Panel
14 April 2023

The role of changing health in rising health-related benefit claims
Is the working-age population less healthy since the pandemic? What role is changing health playing in rising health-related benefit claims?
12 March 2025
Academic research

Small area consumption estimates for local authorities in Great Britain
In this paper, we estimate average equivalised consumption measures across local authority districts in Great Britain.
11 April 2025

Prediction sets and conformal inference with censored outcomes
This paper provides estimation methods of such prediction sets given observed conditioning covariates when 𝑌 is censored or measured in intervals.
21 January 2025

The impact of labour demand shocks when occupational labour supplies are heterogeneous
We develop a tractable equilibrium model of the labour market with heterogeneous labour supply elasticities by occupation and across occupation pairs.
8 April 2025