Downloads
We propose a framework for estimation and inference when the model may be misspecified. We rely on a local asymptotic approach where the degree of misspecification is indexed by the sample size. We construct estimators whose mean squared error is minimax in a neighborhood of the reference model, based on simple one-step adjustments. In addition, we provide confidence intervals that contain the true parameter under local misspecification. To interpret the degree of misspecification, we map it to the local power of a specification test of the reference model. Our approach allows for systematic sensitivity analysis when the parameter of interest may be partially or irregularly identified. As illustrations, we study two binary choice models: a cross-sectional model where the error distribution is misspecified, and a dynamic panel data model where the number of time periods is small and the distribution of individual effects is misspecified.
Authors

Research Associate University College London and University of Oxford
Martin is an IFS Research Associate, a Fellow of the Nuffield College and a Professor in the Department of Economics at the University of Oxford.

Professor of Economics University of Chicago
Working Paper details
- DOI
- 10.1920/wp.cem.2020.3720
- Publisher
- The IFS
Suggested citation
Bonhomme, S and Weidner, M. (2020). Minimizing Sensitivity to Model Misspecification. London: The IFS. Available at: https://ifs.org.uk/publications/minimizing-sensitivity-model-misspecification-0 (accessed: 19 May 2025).
More from IFS
Understand this issue

Gender norms, violence and adolescent girls’ trajectories: Evidence from India
24 October 2022

Why is the government reforming health-related benefits?
We discuss the government's welfare reforms aimed at helping sick and disabled people into work, and what the changes mean for health-related benefits
14 May 2025

Drastic times need drastic action: breaking the 50-year tax taboo
Rachel Reeves should consider increasing the basic rate, just as Denis Healey did in 1975
14 April 2025
Policy analysis

Which places have the highest standard of living?
Measuring living standards using average household spending gives a starkly different picture of regional inequalities than using average income.
11 April 2025

IFS Deputy Director Carl Emmerson appointed to the UK Statistics Authority Methodological Assurance Review Panel
14 April 2023

The role of changing health in rising health-related benefit claims
Is the working-age population less healthy since the pandemic? What role is changing health playing in rising health-related benefit claims?
12 March 2025
Academic research

Using tax records to correct for under-representation of top income sources in surveys
We show that the survey correction method of Blanchet, Flores and Morgan (2022) can fail to correct its structure by components.
6 May 2025

Estimating intra-household sharing from time-use data
Estimating intra-household sharing is crucial to understanding overall inequality. However, expenditure data is almost always at the household level.
2 May 2025

Focal pricing constraints and pass-through of input cost changes
I show that the adoption and extent of focal pricing practices in an industry in general do not lower average pass-through of input cost changes.
2 May 2025