We use real-time scanner data in Great Britain during the COVID-19 pandemic to investigate the drivers of the inflationary spike at the beginning of lockdown and to quantify the impact of high-frequency changes in shopping behaviours and promotions on inflation measurement. Although changes in product-level expenditure shares were unusually high during lockdown, we find that the induced bias in price indices that do not account for expenditure switching is not larger than in prior years. We also document substantial consumer switching towards online shopping and across retailers, but show this was not a key driver of the inflationary spike. In contrast, a reduction in price and quantity promotions was key to driving higher inflation, and lower use of promotions by low-income consumers explains why they experienced moderately lower inflation. Overall, changes in shopping behaviours played only a minor role in driving higher inflation during lockdown; higher prices were the main cause, in particular through a reduced frequency of promotions.
Authors

Research Fellow University of Wisconsin
Martin, previously Deputy Research Director, is a Research Fellow at IFS and Professor of Economics at the University of Wisconsin.

Research Associate London School of Economics
Xavier is a Research Associate at the IFS, an Assistant Professor of Economics at the LSE and a member of the French Council of Economic Analysis.
Working Paper details
- DOI
- 10.1920/wp.ifs.2020.3320
- Publisher
- The IFS
Suggested citation
Jaravel, X and O'Connell, M. (2020). High-frequency changes in shopping behaviours, promotions, and the measurement of inflation: evidence from the Great Lockdown. London: The IFS. Available at: https://ifs.org.uk/publications/high-frequency-changes-shopping-behaviours-promotions-and-measurement-inflation (accessed: 19 June 2025).
Grant
Related documents
Download appendix
PDF | 222.41 KB
More from IFS
Understand this issue

Average household consumption spending before and after housing costs, and mean weekly per-capita income, in different local authorities, 2018–2019
Londoners may have the highest average incomes, but their household spending once you account for housing costs is lower than other regions.
11 April 2025

Rank of local authorities by average household income compared to rank by average consumption after housing costs
On average, London local authorities rank at the top of the income distribution, but are bottom of the net-of-housing consumption distribution.
11 April 2025

Disability, illness and pain are real problems for the entire economy
28 August 2023
Policy analysis

Which places have the highest standard of living?
Measuring living standards using average household spending gives a starkly different picture of regional inequalities than using average income.
11 April 2025

Enlisting consumers in tax enforcement: a policy review
This paper examines the rise of consumer incentives in tax enforcement and the conditions under which they can enhance compliance and raise revenue.
31 March 2025

Share of population facing PM2.5 levels above 10µg/m3 by ethnicity
In 2019, 50% of ethnic minorities were exposed to more than 10µg/m3 air pollution. By 2023, this number had fallen to close to zero.
6 December 2024
Academic research

Measuring cost of living inequality during an inflation surge
We provide new evidence that inflation inequality surged during the 2021–2023 cost-of living crisis.
9 May 2025

Fiscal consolidation and voting: on the electoral costs of budgetary stability
In this paper, we analyse the potential impact of policies aimed at fostering fiscal sustainability on citizens’ preferences.
6 May 2025

Consumer bankruptcy, mortgage default, and labor supply
We specify and estimate a life-cycle model of consumption, housing demand, and labor supply using data on credit reports combined with Census data.
14 April 2025