Access
Dying is expensive in America. Healthcare expenditures from all payors (public and private) total $80,000 in the last 12 months of life and $155,000 in the last 3 years. Although most end-of-life expenses are paid by insurers such as Medicare and Medicaid, the amount households pay out-of-pocket is hardly trivial. Furthermore, some conditions, such as dementia, are not well insured, leaving families with potentially enormous liabilities. In this viewpoint, we discuss the current funding of end-of-life care in the US. We argue that long-term care (LTC) expenses are underinsured relative to other types of late-in-life care, such as hospital spending and doctor visits. We then discuss potential reforms that would better insure families against catastrophic expenses related to LTC.
Authors
Karolos Arapakis
Boston College

CPP Co-Director
Eric is the Montague Burton Professor of Industrial Relations and Labour Economics at the University of Cambridge and Professor of Economics at UCL.
John Jones
Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond

Research Associate University of Bristol
Jeremy is a Research Associate at IFS and an Assistant Professor at the University of Bristol with particular interest in public economics and health.
Journal article details
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.lana.2022.100359
- Publisher
- The Lancet Regional Health – Americas
- ISSN
- 2667-193X
- Issue
- Volume 15, November 2022
Suggested citation
Arapakis, K et al. (2022). 'How should we fund end-of-life care in the US?' 15(2022)
More from IFS
Understand this issue

Simulated list size and performance against the 18-week target under a variety of treatment growth rate assumptions
Although performance improves in each case, in none of our scenarios does performance reach the 92% target by the end of the parliament.
20 March 2025

Can the new government fix the NHS?
14 August 2024

If you can’t see it, you can’t be it: role models influence female junior doctors’ choice of medical specialty
24 April 2024
Policy analysis

Can the government achieve its 18-week elective waiting time target?
Simulation modelling of NHS elective waiting times in England shows that the government’s 18-week target is unlikely to be met in this parliament.
20 March 2025

Percentage of patients waiting less than 18 weeks for elective treatment in England
Performance against the NHS' 18-week waiting times target has since deteriorated gradually before a sharp fall during the pandemic.
20 March 2025

Simulated list size and performance against the 18-week target under medium (3.5%) treatment growth rates
In none of our scenarios with medium growth in treatment volumes is the NHS' 18-week target achieved by the end of the parliament.
20 March 2025
Academic research

The menopause "penalty"
We show that a menopause diagnosis leads to lasting drops in earnings and employment, alongside greater reliance on social transfers.
21 March 2025

Public insurance and marital outcomes: Evidence from the Affordable Care Act's Medicaid expansions
We find that an increased likelihood of Medicaid eligibility reduces marriage rates, particularly among people with higher education levels.
8 November 2024

Health shocks, health insurance, human capital, and the dynamics of earnings and health
We specify and calibrate a life-cycle model of labor supply and savings incorporating health shocks and medical treatment decisions.
21 October 2024