Follow us
Publications Commentary Research People Events News Resources and Videos About IFS
Home Publications FINISH Impact Evaluation Report

FINISH Impact Evaluation Report

Britta Augsburg and Paul Rodríguez-Lesmes
External publication

More than 1 billion of the world's population lack access to improved sanitation [JMP, 2012]. Many antipoverty programs have aimed to increase uptake and usage by alleviating informational constraints and fostering demand and perceived need. Other programs have (partly) relaxed resource constraint by providing subsidies and more recently there are also attempts of improving access to formal financial services for individual sanitation needs of the poor.

One of these programs is implemented by the FINISH Society. FINISH stands for Financial Inclusion Improves Sanitation and Health and the programme is a response to the preventable threats posed by poor sanitation and hygiene. It was launched in 2009 as new approach to improve the health and welfare outcomes of poor households. This approach focuses on financial tools to improve the sanitation situation in both rural and urban areas in India. This document is one of a series of outputs that came and will come out of this evaluation study.

More on this topic

Taxes can be used to better align the private costs and benefits of motoring with the social costs and benefits. This report sets out some key issues and policy options for ‘green’ motor taxes in SSA. It provides an overview of the principles of motor taxation, describes the policy context in ...
IFS Working Paper W21/27
Widespread misconceptions can be critical, especially in times of crisis. Through a field experiment, we study how to address such wrong or inaccurate beliefs using messages delivered to individual citizens using mobile phones. We focus on misinformation related to the COVID-19 pandemic in a ...
IFS Working Paper W21/23
One-quarter of married, fertile-age women in Sub-Saharan Africa report not wanting a pregnancy and yet do not use contraceptives. To study this issue, we collect detailed data on women’s subjective probabilistic beliefs and estimate a structural model of contraceptive choices.