Follow us
Publications Commentary Research People Events News Resources and Videos About IFS
Home Publications Higher education reforms: progressive but complicated with an unwelcome incentive

Higher education reforms: progressive but complicated with an unwelcome incentive

Haroon Chowdry, Lorraine Dearden and Gill Wyness
Briefing note

Details of the proposed changes to higher education (HE) have been finalised ahead of tomorrow's vote in the House of Commons on the raising of the cap on tuition fees to £9,000. We find that:

  • By decile of graduate lifetime earnings, the Government's proposals are more progressive than the current system or that proposed by Lord Browne. The highest earning graduates would pay more on average than both the current system and that proposed by Lord Browne, while lower earning graduates would pay back less. By decile of parental income, graduates from the poorest 30% of households would pay back less than under Lord Browne's proposed system, but more than under the current system. While all graduates from families with incomes above this would pay more, graduates from the 6th and richest (10th) deciles of parental income would pay back the most under the proposed system.

  • The Government announced today that it will up-rate the threshold above which graduates pay back their loan annually in line with earnings (as was proposed by Lord Browne) rather than at 5 year intervals which makes the system more progressive than originally proposed.

  • The National Scholarship fund - through which the taxpayer will cover the third year of fees for students from low income families who attend universities charging over £6,000 a year - will cost the government money in the short term. But we estimate that in the long term the net impact will be to strengthen the public finances slightly (by around £11m a year) if average fee levels are around £7,500 per year. This is mainly because universities will be required to cover the cost of fees for these students in their first year thereby reducing the taxpayer subsidy.

  • The new system is less transparent than the current system and that proposed by Lord Browne, with a more complex system of student support and interest rates. The new system also generates perverse incentives - for example the National Scholarship fund provides a financial incentive for universities charging over £6,000 a year to turn away students from poorer backgrounds.

More on this topic

Briefing note
By 2024−25, after accounting for the specific costs facing schools, we estimate that school spending per pupil will still be 3% lower than in 2010.
Press release
We estimate the actual costs faced by schools and conclude that they are growing by more than economy-wide inflation.
Press release
The value of government support for living costs for university students from the poorest families will fall to its lowest level in seven years in the coming academic year, as maintenance loan entitlements will fail to keep up with inflation.
Observation
the_even_longer_squeeze_on_teacher_pay
Presentation
Christine Farquharson gave a talk on the landscape for early years spending and the challenges facing the sector going forward.