Follow us
Publications Commentary Research People Events News Resources and Videos About IFS
Home Publications Early years inequalities in the wake of the pandemic

Early years inequalities in the wake of the pandemic

Presentation

You can download the event's slides below:


There are important inequalities in the development of children well before they start school. By forcing nurseries to close and dramatically altering the lives of most families with young children, the pandemic may have exacerbated existing inequalities and possibly created new ones.

This event, chaired by Carey Oppenheim, started with a presentation of some of the most recent evidence available on inequalities in the early years and the impact that the pandemic has had and is likely to have on them. The presentation was followed by a debate between various early years policy experts about how best to address inequalities within the current spending envelope.

More on this topic

Press release
New analysis from IFS examines how much families with young children are paying for formal childcare in England.
Presentation
Christine Farquharson gave a talk on the landscape for early years spending and the challenges facing the sector going forward.
IFS Working Paper W21/25
This paper evaluates the short- and medium-term health impacts of offering families with children under 5 universal access to centres providing childcare, health services, parenting support and parental job assistance.
Briefing note
Over the last two decades, Sure Start Children’s Centres (and their predecessors, Sure Start Local Programmes) have been one of the most important policy programmes in the early years in England. These centres operate as ‘one-stop shops’ for families with children under 5, bringing together a ...
Press release
New IFS research finds that one of England’s biggest early years programmes delivered long-lasting health benefits for children through their teenage years. Taken together, the savings from reduced hospitalisations up to age 15 offset around 31% of spending on the programme.