Follow us
Publications Commentary Research People Events News Resources and Videos About IFS
Home Publications £600 maths premium ≠ more maths A-levels

£600 maths premium ≠ more maths A-levels

Newspaper article

The government’s policy to pay schools to get more pupils studying maths is misguided, argues Luke Sibieta – why not raise sixth-form funding instead?

In Wednesday’s Budget, the Chancellor announced various measures aimed at expanding the teaching of maths in schools and colleges. One of the most eye-catching announcements was a commitment to pay “a £600 maths premium for schools [and colleges], for every additional pupil who takes A-level or core maths.”

Precise details about how this policy will work are not yet available. But, as far as I understand it, the intention is to pay schools and colleges £600 for every additional pupil who takes A-level or core maths over and above some baseline (probably the number in the previous year). This represents a lot less than paying £600 for every pupil taking maths.

The proposed formulation could also end up making the funding system horribly complicated. Paying for an additional five pupils in year one would be simple enough, but it seems unlikely that funding would drop if numbers taking maths dropped the following year as that could create volatility in funding levels. If the funding stayed that could create a ratchet effect where schools and colleges see their funding rise when maths numbers go up, but don’t see a fall when they go down.


This is an extract from a longer piece published by Schools Week. For the full article (free to view) please see here.

More on this topic

Press release
By age 27, graduates are 10 percentage points more likely to have moved away from the area where they grew up than otherwise similar non-graduates.
In this report, we study the link between higher education, geographical mobility and outcomes for individuals and regions.
IFS Working Paper W21/28
This paper provides evidence that finishing school when labour markets are weak leads to poor subsequent labour market prospects, particularly those leaving school at younger ages.
Press release
The quality of home learning in England improved substantially over the first year of the pandemic, with particularly big improvements for poorer children. This much-needed improvement is welcome – but, on their own, more equal experiences going forward won’t be enough to overcome the large ...